![]() |
||||||||||||||||||
Pukar Monsoon 2006 |
||||||||||||||||||
Youth and the Urban Identity |
||||||||||||||||||
|
PUKAR’s Fifth Monsoon was held at various venues in South Bombay from May 15 to May 31st, 2006. The annual Monsoon event provided a platform for Mumbai youth to express their ideas on Mumbai city through multiple mediums, including photography, music, radio, film, and writing. These acts of creative expression and documentation have produced serious statements on Mumbai, made by youth from the vantage point of their special location in the city. This year’s Monsoon turned the spotlight on youth themselves under the theme Youth and Urban Identity. It urged youth to ask two questions: “Whose city is it?”; “Whose city will it be?” as a starting point for youth to consider their roles as producers, consumers, activists, artists and shapers of the city’s dynamic future. |
||||||||||||||||||
Lectures |
||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||
|
PUKAR Monsoon’s Lecture Series opened with the talk “Mobilizing Youth: A Case for a Cohesive Identity.” Professor Ram Puniyani began by presenting an overview of defining moments in history when identity politics took on new and exaggerated forms. For Bombay and much of urban India, Puniyani made clear, one of these moments was the 1992 demolition of the Babri Masjid. Puniyani presented the years that followed as a time when religious identity became constructed as an “us/them” narrative in public space. The us/them narrative extends beyond religion, as Puniyani demonstrated, by drawing from examples such as the creation of Bangladesh from East Pakistan, the ongoing rife between Iran and Iraq, among other examples. In the lecture on “Mumbai’s Urban Biodiversity”, environmentalist Anand Pendharkar presented a lively power point presentation on the ecological considerations and green spaces of Mumbai. Pendharkar suggested how trees play a vital role in Mumbai’s sustainability, beyond simply beautification. In the Bombay floods of 2005, for example, Pendharkar reported how certain trees provided resistance by absorbing flood waters. Pendharkar concluded his presentation by speaking of different opportunities for youth to get involved in environmental preservation through his group SPROUTS. In the lecture on “Youth and Educational Institutions”, former PUKAR director Rahul Srivastava presented a historical overview on educational institutions in Mumbai, as a means to understanding the emphasis on certain career tracks, value systems of the academy, and the realities of intense competition. Srivastava drew on his experiences as a former lecturer at Wilson College, in addition to some of his recent work with PUKAR, as means towards creating learning opportunities that fall outside of mainstream education. In the lecture on “Youth, Urban Communities and Revolutions- Premiji to Rang de..”, KRVIA Professor Kaiwan Mehta drew inspiration from Premiji, Bombay’s first Hindi publisher, to demonstrate how the written word and other quieter movements has often laid the groundwork towards social change and challenging complacency. Mehta contrasted the movements of the past to the current hype over the popular film “Rang de Basanti”, which he mentioned, is a loud but not always effective means of protest or long-term change. In the lecture, “Mumbai’s Changing Landscape - Economy and Infrastructure,” former Chief Planner of the MMRDA Vidyadhar Phatak gave an overview of the city’s geographical realities and the challenges they pose for planners. He traced the economic changes over the last few decades and explained their influence on the major growth patterns experienced by the city. Monsoon’s Lecture Series ended with the lecture “Youth and Urban Governance,” which presented possibilities for youth to take ownership over what they identified as challenges to the city’s growth and opportunities to end corruption. Through his role with Lok Satta, a citizen’s actions group committed to democratic reforms and ending corruption, Surendra Srivastava spoke how a stifling political structure has provided limited capacities for the average citizen to voice his opinion. As an alternative, he suggested Lok Satta’s approach to re-thinking urban governance and ensuring its democratic capacity. |
||||||||||||||||||
Workshops |
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||